Thinking like a lawyer frederick schauer harvard university. Fred schauer on and sympathy with the role of rules in constraining decisionmakers. It should be enlightening to the general reader as well, who will learn what, for better and perhaps for worse, distinguishes thinking like a lawyer from other approaches to analyzing social problems. According to schauer, american legal methods often require decisionmakers to do something other than the right thing. Students of the law are often told that they must learn to think like a lawyer, but they are given surprisingly little help in understanding just what this amounts to. The concept of learning to think like a lawyer is one of the cornerstones of legal education in the united states and beyond. Professor frederick schauer examined whether thinking like a lawyer is unique to the legal profession at an alumni luncheon on april 30. Frederick schauer foreword of an introduction to legal. Further, it does not canvass reflective practice, which is another style of thinking incorporated in tlo 6 self. Although thinking like a lawyer likely does include many cognitive processes, a definition of thinking like a lawyer that is too broad is unhelpful. A new introduction to legal reasoning by frederick schauer in chm, fb2, fb3 download ebook. Arguments by legal analogy happen every day in courtrooms, law offices, and lawschool classrooms, and they are the essence of what we mean when we talk of thinking like a lawyer. The identification of thinking skills as a minimum outcome of legal education is unlikely to be seen as contentious or controversial. We also serve the legal profession as it searches for ways to use technology and innovation to bridge the justice gap.
Thinking like a deal lawyer 225 closing date if the car has been driven more than an additional 500 miles. Thinking like a lawyer in the computer agelaw, 88 libr. You are now all well on your way to that magical state that is the end product of your first year in law school. Reasoning by legal analogy has been described as mystical, reframed by skeptics using the deductive syllogism, and called no kind of reasoning at all by judge posner. The textbook is frederick schauer, thinking like a lawyer harvard university press, 2012. Yet schauers book also offers the lawyer and scholar useful perspective on what he or she does. The case study focused on the students impressions of the process of learning to think like a lawyer as revealed. A new introduction to legal reasoning and interrogates both the strengths as well as the shortcoming of the book in the context of contemporary legal education in common law countries. In this longawaited second edition, intended for fans of the original and a new generation of lawyers, vandevelde expands his classic work with useful revisions and updates throughout. The use of analogy in legal argument, cambridge up, 2005, e. Isbn 0674032705 hardbound, 9780674062481 paperback. Vandeveldes thinking like a lawyer first published, it became an instant classic, considered by many to be the gold standard introduction to legal reasoning.
Generally, they are expected to pick up this ability by example. Besides, many of the legal rules that might be learned in law school will have been changed by legal reasoning. Brian leiter times literary supplement 20100212 thinking like a lawyer is excellent reading material for anyone wishing a deeper and more nuancedeven a more magnanimousunderstanding of the motivations behind laws often convoluted pronouncements. Think like a lawyer using a legal reasoning grid and. Levis, an introduction to legal reasoning, chicago up, 20, and raymond wackss philosophy of law. Drawing on a wealth of sources, it shares key tips on how to stay afloat in an ocean of legal texts. Kniha thinking like a lawyer fredericka schauera z roku 2009. In his book, thinking like a lawyer, schauer describes precedents to be previous decisions that should be followed in later cases for that sole reason. When taking the words of a statute seriously, when following a rule even when it does not produce the best result, when treating the fact of a past decision as a reason for making. This paper adopts a narrow view of thinking like a lawyer focussing on legal reasoning rather than critical analysis or creative thinking. Law students, law professors, and lawyers frequently refer to the process of thinking like a lawyer, but attempts to analyze in any systematic way what is meant by that phrase are rare.
A new introduction to legal reasoning 18 2009 hereinafter schauer, thinking like a lawyer. Many of the chapters in the book are concerned with the traditional first year topics. For example, sanson 2006 developed a narrow and broad definition of the phrase to think like a lawyer. All content included on our site, such as text, images, digital downloads and other, is the property of its content suppliers and protected by us and international laws. A new introduction to legal reasoning harvard university press, 2009 schauers text is described as a primer on legal reasoning written for law students. Frederick schauer is the author of thinking like a lawyer 3. Which theory moralism, legalism, historicism or mod. A new introduction to legal reasoning, by frederick schauer 2009 sydlawrw 20. A new introduction to legal reasoning schauer, frederick on.
My 0l reading list law school, getting into law school. Frederick schauers thinking like a lawyer, harvard up, 2012, lloyd weinribs, legal reason. The notsohidden message that law professors give to their students is that to be a lawyer one must think like a lawyer, even if that means suppressing ones compassion, idealism, and concern for truth and justice. Good practice guide bachelor of laws thinking skills. Stephen burton discusses the problem of overbreadth in highlighting the many issues a legal thinker might consider before applying a statute. Vandevelde defines this elusive phrase and identifies the techniques involved in thinking like a lawyer. Many have written about learning to think like a doctor e. In other words, the lawyer has categorized the facts of the clients situation as falling within the factual predicate of the rule. Thinking like a lawyer is excellent reading material for anyone wishing a deeper and more nuancedeven a more magnanimousunderstanding of the motivations behind laws often convoluted pronouncements. Zorn, the federal income tax treatment of gambling. A new introduction to legal reasoning, professor frederick schauer teaches law students that american legal methods often require decisionmakers. A new introduction to legal reasoning by professor frederick schauer suggests why. A lawyers guide to effective writing and editing gives you the specialized knowledge and techniques to draft clear and compelling legal documents, no matter how complicated the issues involved.
Thinking like a lawyer is by far the best available introduction to legal reasoning, of interest to law students and their teachers alike. In addressing the question whether legal reasoning is distinctive, frederick schauer emphasizes the formality and ruledependence of law. To answer the question, the deal lawyer must analyze the goal from both a. Americans are taking new interest in legal reasoning. A new introduction to legal reasoning by schauer, frederick.
Frederick schauer david and mary harrison distinguished. But, if there is no anticipation that the nonlawyerlawyer relationship will actually turn into a formal lawyerclient relationship, not privileged attorneyclient privilege does not extend to disclosures made after the attorney refuse to undertake representation gionis. Generally speaking, legal reasoning corresponds to thinking like a lawyer, but many interpretations have been attributed to this latter phrase james, 2012. The book title, thinking like a lawyer, is a bit misleading on that point. See frederick schauer, is there a psychology of judging. The conclusion is that the legal consequence stated in the rule of law exists in the clients situation. Hello, welcome back to another edition of thinking like a. This is based on the idea that it is sometimes more important to build stability and take the values of the rule of law as important, than to make a perfectly accurate decision in the case at. To me not a lawyer but with some nexus to law, this book is not too hard to read, but i can tell that many points would not be easily understood without any legal experience. A new introduction to legal reasoning frederick schauer this primer on legal reasoning is aimed at law students and upperlevel undergraduates.
For illustrations of what thinking like a lawyer means, see generally frederick schauer, thinking like a lawyer. The course reader is a set of supplementary photocopied materials, which will beavailable for purchase in copyvision in the basement lower level of the law school building, room 18. Thinking like a lawyer in the 21st century enhance and automate the audit, and we have helped to create a free version of the audit for law students. Anyone who has attended law school will recognize llewellyns description. Welcome to thinking like a lawyer with your hosts elie mystal and joe patrice, talking about legal news and pop culture, all while thinking like a lawyer, here on legal talk network. Users facultyoflawuniversityofsydneydesktoptorturing%20democracy. Montgomery, 2006 and learning to think like a lawyer e. The theory of rules, by karl llewellyn, edited and with an introduction by frederick schauer university of chicago press, 2011 thinking like a lawyer. Morrison, eds, the oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning 719, 731. John azzolinilaw library journal 02012010 a welcome complement to edward levis approach, as well as being easier for the legal novice to.
Thinking like a lawyer a new introduction to legal. Studying law is not primarily about learning a bunch of legal rules, the law schools insist, for law has far more rules than can be taught in three years of legal education. Thinking like a lawyer is an essential guide for those starting out on their study of law. A new introduction to legal reasoning, by frederick schauer article pdf available october 2010 with 2,452 reads how we measure reads. A new introduction to legal reasoning and interrogates both the strengths as well as the shortcoming of the book in the context of contemporary. A new introduction to legal reasoning harvard university press, 2009, he has tried to explain that legal reasoningthinking like a lawyeris distinctive in its. A new introduction to legal reasoning by frederick schauer, harvard university press, cambridge ma, 2009, 239pp, isbn 0674032705. We used firstyear students essays on thinking like a lawyer and their visual representations of their concept of law as a point of departure for a longitudinal case study of eight students.
538 937 411 1174 1628 568 399 1250 225 527 1550 812 1269 1456 1574 1242 1039 602 219 159 233 978 238 82 882 1368 914 65 1 639 1372 1354 864